 |
| Lake Urmia is just one of many cases where decades of empty promises have slowly eroded public hope. |
A dear friend, whose mind always seems to be lingering in some corner of an ongoing novel, when the conversation turned to Bartleby, spoke with a tone as layered as the narrative itself. He was captivated by it. Naturally so—someone like him, who dwells on the text while reading, knows exactly when to pause and stare at it. Bartleby, the silent and defiant clerk in Melville’s story, appears to say nothing except for the repeated simple line: “I would prefer not to.” Yet this simple repetition gradually erodes the order around him. While Bartleby seems entirely withdrawn on the surface of the narrative, his refusal disrupts the dominant structure, wearing it down—though it does not entirely collapse. Revisiting Bartleby in that friendly conversation sparked a short piece that you now have before you: a brief reflection on refusal.
The following note describes the state of refusal, not a recommendation for passivity. Sometimes, the mechanisms of power compel society—or parts of it—to withdraw. In such circumstances, refusal is a forced consequence rather than a choice. Therefore, advising someone to adopt a compulsory act, rather than a possible one, is not only impractical but also absurd.
.jpg)
